Date: Wed, 05 Jun 96 18:54:44 -0400 (EDT) From: Dan Hoey To: Cube Lovers Subject: Re: A essay on the NxNxN Cube : counting positions and solving it All the real mechanical 3x3x3, 4x4x4, 5x5x5 Cubes that I've seen only have cubies on the outside, but if you can put back all N^3 cubies in the one I'm describing then you can certainly do the real ones. (In Dan Hoey's notation, I believe that this means I treat the Cube as the G+C group, where G is generated by the outer slice rotations, and C is the rotations of the entire thing.... Actually, the distinction between G and G+C is that in the latter we draw a distinction between cubes that differ by a whole-cube move as different. When we take account of the internal cubies I call it the "Theoretical Invisible cube", described in my Invisible Revenge article 9 August 1982. A solution method is given in Eidswick, J.A., "Cubelike Puzzles -- What Are They and How Do You Solve Them?", 'American Mathematical Monthly', Vol. 93, #3, March 1986, pp. 157-176. that is pretty much like yours, I think. As for counting the positions, I haven't got around to checking the numbers in "Groups of the larger cubes", 24 Jun 1987. You might want to see how they compare to yours. Dan Hoey Hoey@AIC.NRL.Navy.Mil