Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 09:41:09 -0500
To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>
From: Candy Madigan <candymadigan at mindspring.com>
Subject: [WSFA] Re: New members
Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>

As long as they aren't trouble makers...

I've known people who's main hobby in life is to join groups and then to do
their best to destroy them.

At 09:39 AM 02/22/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>What about unreal WSFAns and surreal WSFAns?  Griffin
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Candy Madigan [mailto:candymadigan at mindspring.com]
>Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 9:34 AM
>To: WSFA members
>Subject: [WSFA] Re: New members
>
>Unless someone's a trouble maker, I have no problem with "non-wsfans" being
>on the list.
>
>And if they are a trouble maker, I have trouble with 'real' wsfans.
>
>At 09:39 PM 02/21/2002 -0500, you wrote:
> >I have a friend that's interested in the chat ring, even though she's not a
> >"real" WSFA, i.e. she doesn't come to meetings, but she's definately a fan.
> >Do we have a policy on this?  I'd like to see all who are interested, kinda
> >like anybody sufficantly interested in WSFA shows up at a meeting; all
> >interested enough to want to be on the list should be allowed on.  Anybody
> >have problems with this?
> >
> >_________________________________________________________________
> >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.