From: "lee gilliland" <leeandalexis at hotmail.com>
To: WSFAlist at keithlynch.net
Subject: [WSFA] Re: New members
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 09:44:24 -0500
Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>

We've already got some o' them.

Gryphon on the left

----Original Message Follows----
From: "Strong, Lee" <StrongL at MTMC.ARMY.MIL>
Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>
To: "'WSFA members'" <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>
Subject: [WSFA] Re: New members
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 09:39:59 -0500

What about unreal WSFAns and surreal WSFAns?  Griffin

-----Original Message-----
From: Candy Madigan [mailto:candymadigan at mindspring.com]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 9:34 AM
To: WSFA members
Subject: [WSFA] Re: New members

Unless someone's a trouble maker, I have no problem with "non-wsfans" being
on the list.

And if they are a trouble maker, I have trouble with 'real' wsfans.

At 09:39 PM 02/21/2002 -0500, you wrote:
 >I have a friend that's interested in the chat ring, even though she's not
a
 >"real" WSFA, i.e. she doesn't come to meetings, but she's definately a
fan.
 >Do we have a policy on this?  I'd like to see all who are interested,
kinda
 >like anybody sufficantly interested in WSFA shows up at a meeting; all
 >interested enough to want to be on the list should be allowed on.  Anybody
 >have problems with this?
 >
 >_________________________________________________________________
 >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.

_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com