From: "Strong, Lee" <StrongL at MTMC.ARMY.MIL>
To: "'WSFA members'" <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>
Subject: [WSFA] Re: New members
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 10:26:26 -0500
Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>

Have these people considered joining al-Qaeda?

-----Original Message-----
From: Candy Madigan [mailto:candymadigan at mindspring.com]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 9:41 AM
To: WSFA members
Subject: [WSFA] Re: New members

As long as they aren't trouble makers...

I've known people who's main hobby in life is to join groups and then to do
their best to destroy them.

At 09:39 AM 02/22/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>What about unreal WSFAns and surreal WSFAns?  Griffin
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Candy Madigan [mailto:candymadigan at mindspring.com]
>Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 9:34 AM
>To: WSFA members
>Subject: [WSFA] Re: New members
>
>Unless someone's a trouble maker, I have no problem with "non-wsfans" being
>on the list.
>
>And if they are a trouble maker, I have trouble with 'real' wsfans.
>
>At 09:39 PM 02/21/2002 -0500, you wrote:
> >I have a friend that's interested in the chat ring, even though she's not
a
> >"real" WSFA, i.e. she doesn't come to meetings, but she's definately a
fan.
> >Do we have a policy on this?  I'd like to see all who are interested,
kinda
> >like anybody sufficantly interested in WSFA shows up at a meeting; all
> >interested enough to want to be on the list should be allowed on.
Anybody
> >have problems with this?
> >
> >_________________________________________________________________
> >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.