Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2002 08:32:49 -0500
To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>
From: Candy Madigan <candymadigan at mindspring.com>
Subject: [WSFA] Re: What shpuld Capclave be?
Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>

At 03:02 AM 03/09/2002 -0500, you wrote:

>lee gilliland wrote:
>
> > Why do you want to "swell the throng"?  More bodies don't guarantee a
> better
> > convention.   I think Capclave should find and exploit an underused niche
> > and
> > not try to be All Cons For All People.   And it seems to me that
> Capclave #1
> > has
> > already moved promisingly in that direction.
> >
> > --Ted White
> >
> > I believe the saying is, "The more, the merrier."  Cons are for people.
>
>Well in that case, why not go Whole Hog and plan for 8,000 to 10,000?

Because we're not attracting 8-10K?  (Sarcasm intended)