Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 08:54:15 -0500
To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>
From: Candy Madigan <candymadigan at mindspring.com>
Subject: [WSFA] Re: What shpuld Capclave be?
Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>

At 05:50 PM 03/09/2002 -0500, you wrote:

>Candy Madigan wrote:
>
> > At 03:02 AM 03/09/2002 -0500, you wrote:
> >
> > >lee gilliland wrote:
> > >
> > > > Why do you want to "swell the throng"?  More bodies don't guarantee a
> > > better
> > > > convention.   I think Capclave should find and exploit an underused
> niche
> > > > and
> > > > not try to be All Cons For All People.   And it seems to me that
> > > Capclave #1
> > > > has
> > > > already moved promisingly in that direction.
> > > >
> > > > --Ted White
> > > >
> > > > I believe the saying is, "The more, the merrier."  Cons are for people.
> > >
> > >Well in that case, why not go Whole Hog and plan for 8,000 to 10,000?
> >
> > Because we're not attracting 8-10K?  (Sarcasm intended)
>
>Well, gosh.  I guess that trumped *my* sarcasm, huh?

Oh, my mistake, I thought it was stupidity.