Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 18:44:34 -0500
From: "Michael Walsh" <MJW at mail.press.jhu.edu>
To: <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>
Subject: [WSFA] Re: What shpuld Capclave be?
Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>

>
>----Original Message Follows----
>From: Ted White <tedwhite at compusnet.com>
>Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>
>To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>
>Subject: [WSFA] Re: What shpuld Capclave be?
>Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2002 22:30:43 -0500
>
>Samuel Lubell wrote:
>
> > [...]
> >
> > Earlier, we were writing about people wanting an art show.  One of the
> > things that a bigger con lets you do is use a bigger hotel with more
> > function space so you can do things like an art show, video room etc.
> >
> > However, with WSFA, I suspect we're better off growing slowly and
>focusing
> > on a few things.  My vision of Capclave is a lower-key, Southern =
version
>of
> > Readercon with the main focus on those who read sf (as opposed to =
watch
>it)
>
>I've heard nothing but good things over the years about Readercon =
(making
>me
>wish
>I could afford to attend it), so your vision makes good sense to me.
>
>--Ted White
>
>May I point out there's ALREADY a Readercon?

& there be far more cons with art shows, video, LARPs, etc etc.

I happen to like Readercon - pretentious lit'ry thing that it is.

mjw