Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 17:09:50 -0500
To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>
From: Candy Madigan <candymadigan at mindspring.com>
Subject: [WSFA] Re: What shpuld Capclave be?
Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>

At 10:17 PM 03/11/2002 -0500, you wrote:

>Candy Madigan wrote:
>
> > At 04:46 PM 03/10/2002 -0500, you wrote:
> >
> > >Candy Madigan wrote:
> > >
> > > > At 05:50 PM 03/09/2002 -0500, you wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >Candy Madigan wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > At 03:02 AM 03/09/2002 -0500, you wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >lee gilliland wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Why do you want to "swell the throng"?  More bodies don't
> > > guarantee a
> > > > > > > better
> > > > > > > > convention.   I think Capclave should find and exploit an
> underused
> > > > > niche
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > not try to be All Cons For All People.   And it seems to me
> that
> > > > > > > Capclave #1
> > > > > > > > has
> > > > > > > > already moved promisingly in that direction.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --Ted White
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I believe the saying is, "The more, the merrier."  Cons are for
> > > people.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >Well in that case, why not go Whole Hog and plan for 8,000 to
> 10,000?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Because we're not attracting 8-10K?  (Sarcasm intended)
> > > > >
> > > > >Well, gosh.  I guess that trumped *my* sarcasm, huh?
> > > >
> > > > Oh, my mistake, I thought it was stupidity.
> > >
> > >This is how you make new friends?
> >
> > Not with you.
>
>Clearly.
>
>What's your problem?

You are.

>--Ted White