From: "lee gilliland" <leeandalexis at hotmail.com>
To: WSFAlist at keithlynch.net
Subject: [WSFA] Re: reading likes and dislikes
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 13:55:17 -0500
Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>

Now that is truth.

----Original Message Follows----
From: "Michael Walsh" <MJW at mail.press.jhu.edu>
Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>
To: <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>
Subject: [WSFA] Re: reading likes and dislikes
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 13:47:54 -0500

Sir Arthur should have left well enough alone and left Rama as single =
novel.

mjw

 >>> leeandalexis at hotmail.com 03/26/02 12:49PM >>>

----Original Message Follows----
From: Cathy Green <dalek_cag at yahoo.com>

much as Candy though.  I kind of feel the same way
about Arthur C. Clarke.  Love the short fiction, but
while I didn't actively dislike Rama or Childhood's
End, I don't consider them masterpeices that I would
encourage eveyone I know to read.

Actually, I rather enjoyed the Rama books - the rather aloof stance of =
the
narrator made them very relaxing to read.  The one author I have a bad =
time
with is Asimov - fascinating ideas, but I challenge anybody to find a =
real
live breathing personn in him any where.

_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com

_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com