Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 15:03:33 -0500 From: Ted White <tedwhite at compusnet.com> To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net> Subject: [WSFA] Re: Political Inventions Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net> "Strong, Lee" wrote: > Ted, > My twist on the name of the National Association for the Advancement > of Colored People (NAACP) was intended to satirize their current actions in > fighting a battle that is IMHO long since over. My ancestors paid in blood > to suppress the Confederacy's perversion of the American dream and I am > willing to allow the descendants of the Confederates to fly the Stars & Bars > and/or the Battle Jack in a HISTORICAL setting. I am confident in victory > and don't see a need to grind the faces of the descendants of the > Confederates who have been Americans for many years now. The fact that the > NAACP is spending its time boycotting South Carolina because the former flag > isn't FAR ENOUGH from the Statehouse rather than boycotting bad schools or > bad politicians strikes me as a tragedy for all Americans but especially for > those they claim to be advancing. > Racist? That word meant something once, but in recent years, it's > been so widely misapplied that it's come to mean almost the exact oppositte. > Ignorant? In answer to Erica's question, the real Equal Rights > Amendments are the 14th and 19th. > > Lee Strong > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ted White [mailto:tedwhite at compusnet.com] > Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 4:50 PM > To: WSFA members > Subject: [WSFA] Re: Interesting Inventions > > "Strong, Lee" wrote: > > > The flag did go away but the National Association to Annoy > > Confederate People hasn't. > > I sincerely hope this was not intended to sound as ignorant and racist as it > does. 1. The flag did *not* "go away." 2. A great many black people living in the south perceive that flag -- and the people who wave it -- very differently than you do. For them it's a living reminder of hate and oppression -- wielded by people who *do* hate them and *do* wish to oppress them. 3. On the face of it, your statement which I quoted above *does* sound "ignorant and racist" (and snide). I sincerely hoped that you did not intend that and I'll take your word for it that this is in fact the case. --Ted White