Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 08:10:25 -0800 (PST)
From: Rich Lynch <rw_lynch at yahoo.com>
Subject: [WSFA] Re: Hugo nominees
To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>
Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>

It's a hoax.  (Perhaps we should take that into
account next time he posts something purported to be
factual.)  Hugo Nominations are usually announced on
Nebula Weekend.

Rich

--- lee gilliland <leeandalexis at hotmail.com> wrote:
> Keith posted it.
>
> ----Original Message Follows----
> From: Elspeth Kovar <ekovar at radix.net>
> Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>
> To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>
> Subject: [WSFA] Re: Hugo nominees
> Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 09:49:08 -0500
>
> "Keith F. Lynch" wrote:
>  >
>  > ConJose has counted the Hugo nomination ballots
> in record time.  Less
>  > than 24 hours since voting was closed.  If only
> US elections went this
>  > quickly and smoothly.
>  >
>  > I'm sorry to see that neither _Being Gardner
> Dozois_ nor the WSFA web
>  > site was nominated.  Well, I didn't really expect
> the latter.
>  >
>  > I hope there's still time to get this in the
> April WSFA Journal.
>  >
>  > ---
>  >
>  > ConJose is pleased to announce the nominees for
> the 2002 Hugo Awards.
>  >
>  > There were 495 total nominating ballots.  178 of
> those ballots were
>  > submitted electronically.  There were an
> additional 29 paper ballots,
>  > and 15 electronic ballots that were received,
> that were marked
>  > ineligible for various reasons.
>
> I've been trying to find out more about where this
> came from, not having
> heard it from any other source.  Anyone know?
>
> Elspeth
>
_________________________________________________________________
>

__________________________________________________

http://taxes.yahoo.com/