From: "lee gilliland" <leeandalexis at hotmail.com>
To: WSFAlist at keithlynch.net
Subject: [WSFA] Re: Hugo nominees
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 09:48:59 -0500
Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>

Keith posted it.

----Original Message Follows----
From: Elspeth Kovar <ekovar at radix.net>
Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>
To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>
Subject: [WSFA] Re: Hugo nominees
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 09:49:08 -0500

"Keith F. Lynch" wrote:
 >
 > ConJose has counted the Hugo nomination ballots in record time.  Less
 > than 24 hours since voting was closed.  If only US elections went this
 > quickly and smoothly.
 >
 > I'm sorry to see that neither _Being Gardner Dozois_ nor the WSFA web
 > site was nominated.  Well, I didn't really expect the latter.
 >
 > I hope there's still time to get this in the April WSFA Journal.
 >
 > ---
 >
 > ConJose is pleased to announce the nominees for the 2002 Hugo Awards.
 >
 > There were 495 total nominating ballots.  178 of those ballots were
 > submitted electronically.  There were an additional 29 paper ballots,
 > and 15 electronic ballots that were received, that were marked
 > ineligible for various reasons.

I've been trying to find out more about where this came from, not having
heard it from any other source.  Anyone know?

Elspeth

_________________________________________________________________