Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 11:42:18 -0800 (PST)
From: Rich Lynch <rw_lynch at yahoo.com>
Subject: [WSFA] Re: Hugo nominees
To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>
Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>

No, it's plausible for this year.  Look at the
Dramatic Presentation short list, for instance.

Rich

--- Ted White <tedwhite at compusnet.com> wrote:
>
> lee gilliland wrote:
>
> > ----Original Message Follows----
> > From: Rich Lynch <rw_lynch at yahoo.com>
> > Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>
> > To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>
> > Subject: [WSFA] Re: Hugo nominees
> > Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 08:10:25 -0800 (PST)
> >
> > It's a hoax.  (Perhaps we should take that into
> > account next time he posts something purported to
> be
> > factual.)  Hugo Nominations are usually announced
> on
> > Nebula Weekend.
> >
> > Rich
> >
> > No, it is not.. The list is posted on the Hugo
> site,
> > http://dpsinfo.com/awardweb/hugos.2001.html
>
> You couldn't prove that by this URL.  It yields
> this:  "I am sorry,
> but the page you tried to access on this web site
> does not exist."
> Are you saying that the list Keith posted is really
> (except for
> "Lirpa Loof") last year's nominees?
>
> --Ted White
>

__________________________________________________