Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 12:18:10 -0800 (PST)
From: Rich Lynch <rw_lynch at yahoo.com>
Subject: [WSFA] Re: Hugo nominees
To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>
Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>

There's a "2001.html" web page at that site, but it's
*last* year's nominees.  I know Laurie and that she
absolutely would not pre-post that kind of listing
before the convention had officially released it.

Rich

--- Michael Walsh <MJW at mail.press.jhu.edu> wrote:
> >lee gilliland wrote:
> >>
> >> ----Original Message Follows----
> >> From: Rich Lynch <rw_lynch at yahoo.com>
> >> Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>
> >> To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>
> >> Subject: [WSFA] Re: Hugo nominees
> >> Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 08:10:25 -0800 (PST)
> >>
> >> It's a hoax.  (Perhaps we should take that into
> >> account next time he posts something purported to
> be
> >> factual.)  Hugo Nominations are usually announced
> on
> >> Nebula Weekend.
> >>
> >> Rich
> >>
> >> No, it is not.. The list is posted on the Hugo
> site,
> >> http://dpsinfo.com/awardweb/hugos.2001.html
> >
> >I told Laurie that there was a rumour that it had
> been briefly posted to
> >her site and will quote a *part* of her reply:
> >
> >> Nope, I have no inside information and have never
>
> >> pre-announced any nominations or awards.  I would
> never,
> >> ever do that.
> >
> >Elspeth
> >
> Well, since the URL had hugos.2001 in it, I figured
> it was an error on =
> someones part.  Or not enough caffeine.
>
> mjw
>

__________________________________________________