From: "lee gilliland" <leeandalexis at hotmail.com>
To: WSFAlist at keithlynch.net
Subject: [WSFA] Re: Interesting Inventions
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 13:02:04 -0500
Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>

And if they back off, did they receded succeeding in seceeding seeding?

----Original Message Follows----
From: Steve Smith <sgs at aginc.net>
Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>
To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>
Subject: [WSFA] Re: Interesting Inventions
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 12:55:33 -0500

lee gilliland wrote:
 >
 >         The projected secession convention would have been illegal,
 > unconstitutional and null & void even if it had succeeded in seceeding.
 >
 > Now, if they were farmers planting grain, would any of them be succeeding
in
 > seceeding seeding?

Question is, did they sack seed?

--
Steve Smith                                           sgs at aginc.net
Agincourt Computing                            http://www.aginc.net
"Truth is stranger than fiction because fiction has to make sense."

_________________________________________________________________