Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2002 17:46:12 -0400
To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>
From: Candy Madigan <candymadigan at mindspring.com>
Subject: [WSFA] Re: equal pay
Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>

That's certainly the way I understood it.

At 10:37 AM 04/08/2002 -0400, you wrote:
>Good morning, Ted,
>         I hope that you enjoyed the First Friday meeting.  I certainly did.
>         When I made my little comment, I was supporting the point made by
>Lee Gilliland and others that equal pay for equal work is morally desirable.
>My comment was intended to illustrate how non-economic or non-rational
>factors influence compensation decisions.
>
>Your friend, Lee
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ted White [mailto:tedwhite at compusnet.com]
>Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 4:26 PM
>To: WSFA members
>Subject: [WSFA] Re: equal pay
>
>"Strong, Lee" wrote:
>
> >         If economic decisions were based on pure rationality, then cost
> > conscious employers would prefer to employ inexpensive women rather than
> > expensive men.
>
>Is it your contention that they *don't*?
>
>--Ted White

Candy