From: "Strong, Lee" <StrongL at MTMC.ARMY.MIL>
To: "'WSFA members'" <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>
Subject: [WSFA] Re: sig line
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 09:49:01 -0400
Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>

	I merely report the facts.  That guy named "Lee Strong" who writes
fiction for The WSFA Journal is another fellow entirely.
	Also, in Roman times, that would have been two scrolls.  And, yes,
the Romans had porno scrolls.

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Walsh [mailto:MJW at mail.press.jhu.edu]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 9:21 AM
To: WSFAlist at keithlynch.net
Subject: [WSFA] Re: sig line

 . . . . not "two books" ? ? ?

mjw

>>> StrongL at MTMC.ARMY.MIL 04/11/02 09:23AM >>>
	Freely translated, one of the pieces of graffiti found at Pompei =
is
"I am yours for two coins."

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Walsh [mailto:MJW at mail.press.jhu.edu]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 9:14 AM
To: WSFAlist at keithlynch.net
Subject: [WSFA] Re: sig line

> StrongL at MTMC.ARMY.MIL 04/11/02 08:34AM >>>
>
>	What's Latin for "the law of unintended consequences"?  My =
favorite
>offbeat Latin phrase is "Quid est in hoc meum?"  (What's in it for me?)

What's latin for "Cheap Thrills"?

mjw

>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Michael Walsh [mailto:MJW at mail.press.jhu.edu]
>Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 4:58 PM
>To: WSFAlist at keithlynch.net
>Subject: [WSFA] Re: sig line
>
>Useful?  Whoops, didn't mean to do that . . .
>
>mjw
>
>>>> StrongL at MTMC.ARMY.MIL 04/09/02 05:01PM >>>
>	Finally!  Something useful!
>	Fortitur in re, sed suaviter in modo.  (Unflinching in principle,
>but gracious in method.)
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Michael Walsh [mailto:MJW at mail.press.jhu.edu]
>Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 4:45 PM
>To: WSFAlist at keithlynch.net
>Subject: [WSFA] sig line
>
>Need something delightful obscure to put in a sig line?
>
>http://hr.uoregon.edu/davidrl/latin.html
>