From: "lee gilliland" <leeandalexis at hotmail.com>
To: WSFAlist at keithlynch.net
Subject: [WSFA] Re: Could use some editing, was So Many Universes, So Little Time
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 17:35:59 -0400
Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>

 > [...]
 >
 > In all of RAH's later work (TNotB and after), I get a strong feeling
 > that he really, really needed a good editor.  Lotta good stuff, mixed in
 > with a lot of crap that a less exalted author wouldn't be allowed to get
 > away with.

And for good reason:  by then Heinlein could write his own contracts.

Heinlein's original writing scheme (for novels at least) was to overwrite --
by
maybe 50%.  That is, he wrote *everything* -- all the connective tissues,
all the
conversations, etc.   Then he *edited* -- in the process discarding the
chaff and
saving the wheat, and shortening his novel by as much as one-third.   This
resulted in a number of good books.

Supposedly he stopped doing this with STRANGER -- which he had begun in the
late
'40s and then set aside, using the same Martian setup for his juvenile, RED
PLANET, and which he completed about ten years later.  (But when the
"unexpurgated" version of STRANGER was released we discovered that he had in
fact
chopped some of the more embarrassing parts of that book as well.)  In any
event,
Heinlein became increasingly self-indulgent after STRANGER, and increasingly
he
went unedited as well.

Too bad.

--Ted White

Interstingly, Alan Dean Foster has reached the point where he can start to
demand less editing, but is mature enough not to do it, as apparently (he
says)  his editors chop about half the books out - but they are better for
it.  OMG, a reponsible mature writer!

Ps anybody shows this to Alexis is dead meat.

_________________________________________________________________