Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 15:50:15 -0400
From: "Michael Walsh" <MJW at mail.press.jhu.edu>
To: <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>
Subject: [WSFA] Fan Writer Hugo Enlightenment - Long
Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>

>tedwhite at compusnet.com 04/19/02 03:51PM

[deletia occurs]

>The notion that *anyone* could be nominated to the Hugo ballot who is so
>little known that there might be two of him (or her), each with his (or =
her)
>own partisans, says something scary about modern-day "fandom."
>
>*Sigh*....
>
>--Ted White

I did receive this regarding Mr Berkwits, via Criag Miller.

mjw

It was pointed out on Timebinders that a letter exchange
between Jeff Berkwits and artist Frank Wu appears on Wu's
website <http://www.frankwu.com/
>.  Here is that exchange.
(I've heard, but have no evidence, that Mr. Berkwits sent
similar letters to a number of other people.

>From Jeff Berkwits Feb. 5, 2002
>
>Dear Frank: Hello!
>
>Jeff Berkwits here: you probably don't remember me, but I
>believe we met briefly at the Writers of the Future Awards
>Ceremony in 2000, which I covered for the late, lamented
>GalaxyOnline.com.  Anyhow, I hope that you are doing well
>and that your art is coming along nicely.  (I can tell that it is
>from your Website updates -- congratulations!)
>
>I know that now is the time for Hugo nominations, so I was
>wondering if I could ask a two-part favor from you (for which
>I, of course, will reciprocate).  Last year was a banner year
>for me in terms of SF writing: I had a few items posted at
>GalaxyOnline.com before they went bust, along with my
>various commentaries at Locus Online (in case you did not
>see them, here are links to two of them...
>http://www.locusmag.com/2001/Commentary/Berkwits0514.html,
>http://www.locusmag.com/2001/Commentary/Berkwits08.html),
>my work at SciFiNow.com (before they too went bust), my
>contributions to the Argentus fanzine, interviews with Algis
>Budrys (at Science Fiction Weekly --
>http://www.scifi.com/sfw/issue209/interview.html) and Frank
>Kelly Freas (in Outr=E9 magazine) plus, of course, my usual
>Science Fiction Weekly writing.  So I figured this is the year
>to at least try to get nominated in the _Best Fan Writer_
>category. So...
>
>Would you mind nominating *me* for _Best Fan Writer_ this
>year (if you in fact do Hugo nominations, which you'd be
>eligible for if you were a member of last year's Worldcon in
>Philadelphia or this year's Worldcon in San Jose)?
>
>                                               and
>
>Would you mind asking/suggesting to as many of your World
>Con-going friends, colleagues, relatives, etc. as possible to
>also nominate me?  I am happy to nominate them too (in
>their respective categories  :-) ) if they'd like.
>
>Of course -- and here's the reciprocal part -- I intend to
>nominate you in the _Best Fan Artist_ category (if you would
>like), and similarly suggest the same to my friends!  In re-
>reading my WotF volume recently, (for which I am definitely
>nominating Melissa Yuan-Innes, Michael Jasper and Toby
>Buckell for the Campbell Award), I also enjoyed your
>illustration for "Guildmaster," which led me, in part, to your
>Website, which led me to writing this letter.
>
>Regardless, I am really trying to get onto the ballot, as last
>year was a crucial year for me in terms of the breadth and
>depth of my critical SF writing.  As you may know, the voting
>in this particular category can be very tight, so every vote
>counts in the nomination process!
>
>Anyhow, I would very much appreciate your support and vote
>in the _Best Fan Writer_ category in this year's Hugo
>nomination process, and you certainly have my vote this
>year for a _Best Fan Artist_ nomination.  All the best, and I
>look forward to hopefully hearing from you.
>
>Jeff Berkwits
>
>My reply:
>
>Hey, Jeff.  Thanks for your note. I will definitely nominate you
>in the best fan writer category - no problem, and certainly I
>appreciate the nod for myself!
>
>I visited the articles you sent.  I think you're right that the
>internet is a flood of information, a final encyclopedia, but
>perhaps there is a glut of misinformation.  Perhaps the
>analogy is the library that Italo Calvino wrote about in
>"Numbers in the Dark", which contains every book ever
>written - but also contains slight variations thereof, i.e., right
>next to the correct book is another book with one sentence
>wrong, and the book next to that has two sentences wrong,
>and so forth - so it's almost impossible to find the exact right
>book among the background buzz.  I find the Internet
>particularly worthless in finding out about anything that
>happened before, oh, 1991.
>
>Well, you get what you pay for.
>
>Anyway, Jeff, nice to hear from you, and I will nominate you,
>and I also nominated Toby and Jeff and Mike, but also
>Carrie Vaughan and Ken Wharton.
>
>Are you, in fact, coming to WorldCon?  I imagine you would
>be, if you're on the final ballot.  But, if so, I'll see you there.
>(My con schedule is: Boskone (yikes- really soon, better get
>ready), Norwescon in Seattle, BayCon here in the bay area,
>the L.A. con over fourth of July, and WorldCon.  Maybe
>Loscon in Nov.  You going to any of those?
>
>Frank
>
>P.S. I found it interesting when you commented that you are
>unlikely to find a bad review of an author's work on his
>website.  So... if you want to same something less-than-
>glowing about any of my artwork (like you didn't particularly
>care for one piece or other - and that's cool, because they're
>all pretty different and some are intentionally ugly or
>repulsive), go ahead, I can take it, and I will post that so all
>opinions get equal airtime.