Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 13:59:19 -0400
From: "Michael Walsh" <MJW at mail.press.jhu.edu>
To: <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>
Subject: [WSFA] Re: On Google and WSFA policy
Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>

> sfbookfan at yahoo.com 04/26/02 12:58PM >>>>
>>> Interestingly, ronkean at juno.com said:
>> >Would there be any support for having a list policy
>> that message content
>> >which has not otherwise been made public, shall not
>> be disseminated
>> >outside WSFA?
>
>And this would be enforced how?  As we've seen with
>laws of any state, what good is making rules if they
>cannot be enforced?
>
>Also, how do you decide if something is made public?
>Is taking about running Capclave public if you also
>talk about it at the meeting?  People have gone around
>and around about who is a public figure and what can
>be said about them in courts.  It's just as hard to
>decided what  is make public.
>
>=====
>Member of the Canned Food Alliance, Nicki Lynch
>
>=====
>MIMOSA web site: http://www.jophan.org/mimosa

I would suggest that anyone who is on this list - or subsequently joins =
this list - be made aware that even though the contents are not public, =
there is nothing to keep any remarks from being repeated elsewhere.

Again, treat this list an extension of public conversation at a WSFA =
meeting.

Private conversations should be kept private and offlist.

mjw