Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2002 19:20:25 -0400
To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>
From: Candy Madigan <candymadigan at mindspring.com>
Subject: [WSFA] Re: On Google and WSFA policy
Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>

At 01:59 PM 04/26/2002 -0400, you wrote:
> > sfbookfan at yahoo.com 04/26/02 12:58PM >>>>
> >>> Interestingly, ronkean at juno.com said:
> >> >Would there be any support for having a list policy
> >> that message content
> >> >which has not otherwise been made public, shall not
> >> be disseminated
> >> >outside WSFA?
> >
> >And this would be enforced how?  As we've seen with
> >laws of any state, what good is making rules if they
> >cannot be enforced?
> >
> >Also, how do you decide if something is made public?
> >Is taking about running Capclave public if you also
> >talk about it at the meeting?  People have gone around
> >and around about who is a public figure and what can
> >be said about them in courts.  It's just as hard to
> >decided what  is make public.
> >
> >=====
> >Member of the Canned Food Alliance, Nicki Lynch
> >
> >=====
> >MIMOSA web site: http://www.jophan.org/mimosa
>
>I would suggest that anyone who is on this list - or subsequently joins =
>this list - be made aware that even though the contents are not public, =
>there is nothing to keep any remarks from being repeated elsewhere.
>
>Again, treat this list an extension of public conversation at a WSFA =
>meeting.
>
>Private conversations should be kept private and offlist.

And that is exactly how I want it treated.

Candy