Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 16:50:18 -0400 To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net> From: Candy Madigan <candymadigan at mindspring.com> Subject: [WSFA] Re: MASH (Was: Grit and Punk) Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net> With the cancellation of Dark Angel, I have given up TV. At 11:13 AM 05/21/2002 -0400, you wrote: >"Strong, Lee" wrote: > > > > Ted White provided histories of "grit" and "punk" in response to my > > question What realities do "grit" and "punk" reveal. He asked if I would > > consider "M*A*S*H" noir? Answer: Based on my extremely limited viewing of > > the program, and Ted's definition of "noir", No. > >Hmm. My understanding was that "noir" was a visual description, as >opposed to a matter of plot or theme. I think of "Casablanca" as the >prototype "noir" film -- black & white, lots of dark (as in low-light) >scenes, with large masses of undiffereintiatd single shades. [1] > >MASH (the movie) was a very dark (not noir) comedy. One of the best >ever, IMHO. The TV show was Yet Another Sitcom. I can't watch sitcoms >-- I haven't watched them in so long that I no longer understand the >conventions. To me, sitcoms are kabuki -- it's obvious that the actors >are doing something purposeful with a great deal of skill. It's not at >all apparent what it's supposed to mean. > > > My father ran a real MASH unit in the real Korean War, and he said > > that both Korea and MASH were a hell of a lot more fun on TV than in real > > life. If the TV show "M*A*S*H" was supposed to be realistic, it failed. > >The movie tries to be more realistic, but often, it's not really clear >what's supposed to be going on. I'd be interested in hearing your >father's opinion of the book, which *was* intended to be realistic as >well as funny. > >[1] May Ted Turner be nibbled to death by parakeets if he follows >through on his plan to colorize it. > >-- >Steve Smith sgs at aginc.net >Agincourt Computing http://www.aginc.net >"Truth is stranger than fiction because fiction has to make sense." Candy