From: "Strong, Lee" <StrongL at MTMC.ARMY.MIL> To: "'WSFA members'" <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net> Subject: [WSFA] Re: Subtle Thoughts Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 12:38:59 -0400 Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net> I believe it was George Orwell (Eric Blair) who stated that some things are so foolish that only an intellectual would believe them. -----Original Message----- From: Steve Smith [mailto:sgs at aginc.net] Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 12:16 PM To: WSFA members Subject: [WSFA] Re: Subtle Thoughts "Strong, Lee" wrote: > > My attempts have certainly not always been appreciated, he said > modestly. > Subtlety in science fiction and literature generally is an > interesting subject (to me anyway). On several occasions, I have read a > review of a science fictional work in which the reviewer states that the > author introduces a concept subtlely. Then, I read the work itself and find > that the author is pretty explicit about the concept. Where's the subtlety, > I wonder? Never having questioned a reviewer about why he or she considered > the basic work to be subtle, I am left wondering. My outstanding example of > this perceived subtlety versus author's actual statement occured in one of > Gene Wolfe's Torturer/New Sun books in which a cyborg's "replacement parts" > are revealed to be his fleshy parts, not his metallic parts. Wolfe had his > cyborg character state this explicitly, so I am left wondering why the > reviewer -- whose name I have totally forgotten -- found this to be subtle. > Once Upon A Time, Jack Chalker mentioned that *not one reviewer* realized that "The River of Dancing Gods" was supposed to be a spoof. Joe the Barbarian? Marge the Witch? The great magic sword Irving? To me, the whole book was full of pie- in- the- face silliness. Apparently, all the reviewers missed it entirely. -- Steve Smith sgs at aginc.net Agincourt Computing http://www.aginc.net "Truth is stranger than fiction because fiction has to make sense."