Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 18:51:31 -0400 To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net> From: Candy Madigan <candymadigan at mindspring.com> Subject: [WSFA] Re: Matigan's Conjecture Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net> 100 is average. I think I mentioned that somewhere. At 08:18 AM 07/09/2002 -0400, you wrote: > When discussing IQ tests and measures, it is desirable to mention >what scale or test you are referring to since various tests define human >normal differently. I was rather impressed by one (non-WSFAn) fellow's 165 >score until he mentioned that 120 was human normal on that scale. > >-----Original Message----- >From: Candy Madigan [mailto:candymadigan at mindspring.com] >Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:30 PM >To: WSFA members >Subject: [WSFA] Re: Goldbach's Conjecture > >At 09:53 AM 06/20/2002 -0400, you wrote: > >Ted White wrote: > > > > > So are you saying that "the average IQ at a WSFA meeting" equates to > > all WSFAns > > > averaging in the top two percentiles of IQ? > > > >I find that the average WSFAn is quicker on the uptake, and has a far > >wider range of knowlege and interest than the average Mensan. > > > >As to test scores, who knows? > >The DC area Mensans are just plain boring. Very few of them know anything >about anything. They've taken a test and have been told they are smart and >clever, but they aren't. > >I'm not *exactly* sure what my IQ is, because I wasn't tested as a child, >but I do know that it's at least 2 standard deviations above the norm. I >do know what my daughter's IQ is (and please don't share this with her, >because she does not have a "need to know"). Her aggregate IQ is 140. The >reason it is so low is that her "processing speed" is 86. *Everything* >else is well above 140 with verbal being 157. Admittedly, it is possible >for a parent to have offspring that are sports, but... That's not normally >the case. > >No, I don't know my IQ, but she got it from somewhere and looking at the >rest of my family, I'm pretty sure that at least some of it came from me. > >Candy Candy