From: "Strong, Lee" <StrongL at MTMC.ARMY.MIL>
To: "'WSFA members'" <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>
Subject: [WSFA] Re: Burning at the Stake (!)
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 12:15:58 -0400
Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>

	Ted, I declare you to be the winner of the WSFA Chat List Mud
Wrestling Contest.  I believe that I have made my points in the eyes of
reasonable people and that I will never make my points in the eyes of
unreasonable people.
	So.  Is anyone interested in discussing science fiction, fantasy,
science, or fandom?  Lee

-----Original Message-----
From: Ted White [mailto:twhite8 at cox.net]
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 12:07 PM
To: WSFA members
Subject: [WSFA] Re: Burning at the Stake (!)

----- Original Message -----
From: "Strong, Lee" <StrongL at MTMC.ARMY.MIL>
To: "'WSFA members'" <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 8:11 AM
Subject: [WSFA] Re: Burning at the Stake (!)

> Well, Ted, you're wrong, as a review of the archives of this chat
> list will reveal.  I mentioned that I had read about the Shaver Mystery
and
> you vehemently accused me of being a Shaverian (i.e. advocate of Mr.
> Shaver's theories).  I denied it, and you went on to accuse me of
Shaverian
> advocacy in stronger terms including a credulous reliance on Mr. Shaver's
> rock records.  This statement of yours was totally without foundation
since,
> at that time, I had never even heard of Mr. Shaver's rock records and I
have
> never before or since advocated Mr. Shaver's colorful but ludicrous
> theories.  Your statement that you can remember events shortly after your
> birth sits oddly with your demonstrated inability to remember what you
wrote
> on this chat list several months ago.  Your repeated false and
patronizing
> statements about other people tend to discredit any statement that you
make.

It's a real shame that your reading comprehension is so poor, Lee.  And
that your accusations against me seem to wobble from one point to another
without any real comprehension of what *you* are saying and the
inconsistencies in your own statements.

Contrast your statement above with your statement yesterday: "The reason
why I mentioned the Shaver Mystery is because you previously condemned me
vigorously for even reading about said Mystery [Hoax actually]."  You can't
even keep straight what it is I said about you and the Shaver Mystery for
*one day*.

--Ted White