Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 11:05:24 -0400 From: Steve Smith <sgs at aginc.net> To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net> Subject: [WSFA] Re: Netscape on its deathbed Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net> Keith F. Lynch wrote: > Wade Lynch wrote: > >>The end is near for Netscape: >>http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/pcworld/20030717/tc_pcworld/111604 > > Steve Smith wrote: > >>Internet Explorer is also going away as a standalone product: >><http://www.silicon.com/news/500019/1/4438.html> > > Good. Maybe those websites that insist I "upgrade" to either Netscape > or IE will Get A Clue. We can dream. More likely, they'll tell us to "upgrade" to the latest version of Windows. In their eyes, we really *should* buy new computers just to look at their Websites. (Corporate Web designers, in general, do not suffer from low self-esteem.) In the Web design I've done, I've found it actually easier to build standards-compliant pages. The standards (at <http://www.w3.org>) are clear, complete, and readily available. I suspect that most Web designers don't really know any HTML and just use the raw output from a fancy "design tool". (IMHO, this is like a cook who doesn't know how to slice vegetables.) > There are plenty of other browsers out there. 1X, AWeb, Amiga > Voyager, Aplix_SANYO, Aplix_SEGASATURN, AvantGo, Beonex Communicator, > Camino, Chimera, Commerce, Cuam, Cyberdog, eCatch, ELinks, Firebird, > Galeon, Girafa, HTTrack, HotJava, iCab, Jonzilla, K-meleon, KDDI, > Konqueror, Links, Lynx, Meta Products, Mozilla, multiBlocker, > Nautilus, NetCaptor, NetPositive, OffByOne, OmniWeb, Opera, Phoenix, > Planetweb, Safexplorer, SiteKiosk, Tulip Chain, w3m, Wanna-Be, > WebCopier, WebZip, Xaldon, and Zeus, for instance. Mosaic and Cello seem to be no more. W3 is still doing Amaya. It's guaranteed standards compliant, but it crashes a lot. -- Steve Smith sgs at aginc.net Agincourt Computing http://www.aginc.net "Truth is stranger than fiction because fiction has to make sense."