From: "Ted White" <twhite8 at cox.net>
To: "WSFA members" <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>
Subject: [WSFA] Re: That "new" Heinlein novel . .
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 17:44:26 -0500
Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>

----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Walsh" <MJW at mail.press.jhu.edu>
To: <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>
Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2004 4:06 PM
Subject: [WSFA] Re: That "new" Heinlein novel . .

> >twhite8 at cox.net 01/02/04 06:20PM
> >>----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Michael Walsh" <MJW at mail.press.jhu.edu>
> >To: <wsfalist at keithlynch.net>
> >Sent: Friday, January 02, 2004 1:05 PM
> >Subject: [WSFA] That "new" Heinlein novel . .
> >
[...]
>
> The only pulps with any hint of sex (and usually somewhat unpleasant)
that =
> I'm aware of are the "spicy pulps"; here's a sample of the covers from a
=
> company doing facsimiles of them
<http://www.adventurehouse.com/shopping/en=
> -us/dept_85.html>  Others can be found by using Google images and search
=
> for: Spicy Pulps

Yes, but those were on the way out by 1939.

--Ted White