Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 10:24:17 -0500 From: "Michael Walsh" <MJW at mail.press.jhu.edu> To: <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net> Subject: [WSFA] Capclave nattering, was: The End of Austerity? Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net> > kfl at KeithLynch.net 01/15/04 10:22PM deletia occurs > >> Fans aren't slans. You'd sorta think that SF fans, believers in the >> future, in change, folks who can deal with "future shock" could deal >> with a different hotel and/or date. Apparently not. > >What makes you think it's the change of hotel and/or date that's >responsible for the low and decreasing Capclave turnout? For 2003 I suspect one factor was the proximity to Thanksgiving. I'd hate to think it's our choice of GoHs driving folks away. > >> Ideally if we get enough room nights we get free function space. >> In theory; of course it depends upon the hotel contract. > >Yes. I'm just not sure we should keep counting on them. People are >traveling less. AFAIK, Boskone & Lunacon are holding reasonably steady in warm body count. = Philcon, due to a rather significan date change has suffered. > Perhaps we should expect to mainly get locals. At >least until the economy improves and the TSA is abolished. > >> As for locals . . . we just need to find them. Last time I checked >> most bookstores sold SF - think there could be potential Capclave >> attendees there? > >Are bookstores likely to be receptive to putting fliers near their SF >racks? (Fliers placed near the door are likely to go unseen, if only >because people who stand in the doorway to read them would be impeding >traffic.) There's a large new Borders Books right across the street >from our new hotel. They have a large SF section. It has a fair >number of OEB books. Unfortunately they don't seem to have *any* >books by this year's or next year's guest of honor. (Or last year's >either, not that that would do much good.) Borders is difficult for small presses to deal with. And for medium sized = presses. I know of publisher who became so cranky over billing disputes = that Borders was coming up with, that not only did they put Borders on = credit hold, but they even refused to take prepaid special orders from = individual stores. The publisher told the Borders person placing the = special order that until issues were resolved no more books - and they = told the borders staff person who to complain to at the Borders home = office. Things were eventually resolved. But I digress . . . Fliers in B&Ns are pretty much impossible. Many Borders stores have a = bulletin board for local groups to put up flyers, but nothing near the = skiffy section, atleast here in Baltimore, YMMV in the DC area. One thought would be for Capclave to bring in the GoH a day early for an = event at some local stores. Thatmight get some additonal warm bodies = atthe con. Pershpas WSFA could sponsor a Meet the Author(s) at local = stores? As for the GoHs for 2004 & 2005, Polotta is published by Wildside Press = these days, which is strictly print-on-demand. So, you're not likely to = find his stuff in stores. As for Waldrop, he has a collection from Golden Gryphon, Custer's Last = Jump and other collaborations (ISBN: 1930846134) which mightbe findable in = the chain stores. They tend to not reorder unless the book sells fairly = well. Golden Gryphon has also published a limited edition chapbook, = available ONLY from them (it lacks an ISBN), entitles "A Better World's in = Birth". Here's the synopsis from the Golden Gryphon website <http://www.go= ldengryphon.com/betterworld-right.html>: "It's 1876, twenty-three years after the executions of the Peoples' = Revolutionary leaders Friedrich Engels, Karl Marx, and Richard Wagner - - and spectres in the = guise of these three men are haunting Communist Europe, specifically the city of Dresden. = Officer Rienzi, from the Peoples' Department for Security, is called in to = investigate. Are these spectres truly ghosts of the Revolution's leaders? Or is there a larger = conspiracy afoot? nd if a conspiracy, does it involve Comrade Leader Eisenmann, who became = head of the Peoples' Federated States of Europe following the death of Wagner?" & from a smaller press (Wheatland) there's this collection: Dream = Factories and Radio Pictures (ISBN 097205474X ) And I should note, that even though Howard may not be much in print, his = OP stuff is not cheap. His first collection, Howard Who?, is going for, = online, a minimum of $50 for an ex-lib copy, and up to $175 for a signed, = unread copy. But that said, I do wonder what effect a GoH has on con numbers? When = Balticon had Robert Jordan, an author who sells lots of books, the change = was . . barely noticed. The only time in recent years that a GoH had a = noticeable effect on Balticon was when Octavia Butler was GoH, and that = was the addition of number of African-American attendees that year. > >> I'd like to see some, I said some, of the money spent for some >> fannish good. > >Two words: WSFA Clubhouse! Aieeeeeeeeee ! ! ! ! ! > >> Now what that is, I don't know. I don't think it's a student >> writing contest that has spent an average of $10,000 a year. > >I'd like to know how a student writing contest costs that much money. >Are state-of-the-art PCs with expensive word processing programs and >printers being bought for each participating student? Is the winner's >trophy made of gold and platinum? Other than attending the 1998 Worldcon I have not been involved in any = Bucconeer projects, so we'll have to hear from the student writing contest = folks for answers. Forthose who are interested, thefinancial reports from = Bucky are online since they had to be reproted to the WSFS business = meeting each year until the surplus was deplete. No, there's no one easy = to find site. You'll have to Google away - probably best to use WSFS = Bucconeer and possible financial report(s) as search terms. > >>> I don't know why Judy and Bob aren't subscribers. I think every >>> WSFA officer should be. Better yet, every WSFA member. > >> Officers yes (unless there is some problem that can't be reseolved). >> For club members, it should remain optional. > >It should remain optional for everyone, in the sense that I'm not >suggesting that anyone should be kicked out of office for refusing >to subscribe. But I think it should be strongly encouraged. And >that sending an email to WSFAns who are *not* on the list should be >discouraged (unless the email is meant specifically for them, of >course) since people who choose not to subscribe presumably don't >want to receive WSFA-related email. Sounds fine by me . . . . > >Also, I don't think we need to set up a separate email list just for >Capclave. The volume of this list is not so high that it needs to >be split into subject categories. In genral, I'll try to keep as much information flowing to the club as = possible. mjw