Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:32:26 -0500 From: "Michael Walsh" <MJW at mail.press.jhu.edu> To: <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net> Subject: [WSFA] Re: Still more on the Capclave '04 web page Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net> >twhite8 at cox.net 03/10/04 11:48AM >>----- Original Message ----- >From: "ecf" <ecfield at comcast.net> >To: "WSFA members" <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net> >Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 8:42 AM >Subject: [WSFA] Still more on the Capclave '04 web page > >> >> >On Tue, 9 Mar 2004 20:32:59 -0800 (PST) Rich Lynch ><rw_lynch at yahoo.com> >> >writes: >> > >> >>--- "Keith F. Lynch" <kfl at KeithLynch.net> wrote: >> >> >> >>>Ok, the consensus seems to be for the first .PNG, >> >>> >> >>Whose consensus? That's the one that has the bright yellow >> >>background when viewed in Netscape 4.7. It looks bad in >> >>Netscape, in other words. >> >> >> >>Once again, strongly recommend that you use a GIF image >> >>with a transparent background instead of whatever format >> >>that image is. >> >> >> The .PNG file has a transparent background. It is the latest format >> recognized by all current browsers. It is an update from both GIF and >> JPG for this reason. >> >> Since the current version of Netscape is 7.x, I would think 4.7 is VERY >> old and is used in very few systems nowadays. It would seem to make a >> lot better sense to upgrade to one of the half-dozen current FREE >> browsers instead of forcing everybody to fall back to support an = antique >> browser. >> >> Just my not-so-humble opinion of course. > >A lot of Netscape users prefer 4.7 to any of the newer versions, I certainly prefer it to IE 5.5. Or is that Aieeeeeeee 5.5? >and I >would not call it "antique." It's important to realize that not = everyone >updates relentlessly to the latest version of something, and that many >seasoned computer users are wary of the latest updates, Letting others be the pigeon in the mine . . . >preferring less >bloated software. And not all of us have the latest computer, either....= > >--Ted White mjw