From: <samlubell at verizon.net>
To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>
Subject: [WSFA] Re: Washington Slush Fund Association (WSFA)?
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 11:25:22 -0600
Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>

>
> From: "Michael Walsh" <MJW at mail.press.jhu.edu>
> Anyway, my posting of the Clarion thing was to spark discussion as to what =
>to with the money. I think sitting on it is not a good idea - I'd rather =
>we set up a mechanism to deal with the spending ideas. One of these ideas =
>is that for any suggested spending over a certain amount (that figure to =
>be determine bythe club) that such a motion be voted on at two consecutive =
>meetings (preferably so that both VA & MD folks have an equal voice).

At a previous meeting, the members voted to have the president form a committee to look into options.

And your idea of having spending over a certain amount be approved in both locations would require a constitutional admendment.

Keith, you just did this analysis, what's the typical non-overlap between Virginia and Maryland meetings?

[ Base64 attachment manually removed by KFL ]