Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 12:09:09 -0400 From: "Michael Walsh" <MJW at press.jhu.edu> To: <WSFAlist at WSFA.org> Subject: [WSFA] Re: As Others See Us Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at WSFA.org> > twhite8 at cox.net 10/21/04 12:02:10 PM >>> >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Michael Walsh" <MJW at press.jhu.edu> >To: <WSFAlist at WSFA.org> >Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 9:53 AM >Subject: [WSFA] As Others See Us >> ><http://www.riverfronttimes.com/issues/2004-10- >20/news/feature_print.html> >> >> The headline: >> >> "Geeks Gone Wild >> If you can't get laid at a science-fiction convention, you >can't get >> laid! >> BY MIKE SEELY" > >"Owing largely to the tumultuous political terrain of the late >'60s, the >St. Louis WorldCon proved to be a raucous event that saw >thousands of >counterculture types overwhelm the posh Central West End >hostelry and its >facilities. > >""There was very little alcohol and huge quantities of pot and >acid," >recounts Brock "Dev" Hanke, a medieval enthusiast (and >former Riverfront >Times contributor) in his fifties who attended the '69 debacle >and recalls >thousands of participants camping out in Forest Park rather >than booking >rooms. "The poor wedding parties at the Chase were trapped >in their >ballrooms. They had no idea what was happening." > >"Chase brass promptly swore to never again allow St. Louis' >sci-fi >community to use its facilities. But thanks in no small part to an >appearance by Stephen King, the hotel played host to Archon >6 in 1982, >attracting a record 1,750 participants." > >What nonsense! St. Louis's 1969 Worldcon had an >attendance of just over >1,500. Ol' "Dev" must've been tripping his brains out, >because his >memories are totally false. And the 1980 Archon, which I >attended, was >also in the Chase Park Plaza -- one of the most miserably >uncomfortable >hotels I've ever been in. I wrote a letter of complaint to its >manager. >The maid staff short-sheeted the beds (bottom sheets stopped >two thirds of >the way to the foot of the bed) and the "air-conditioning" was >so humid >that it left the beds *damp*. But then, when did reporters >*ever* write >up SF cons accurately? As for the description of Archon, it would appear to be accurate, just not the whole story. Cons can be a target rich enviroment such "reporting". Fair & Balanced it ain't. mjw > >--Ted White >