Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 16:26:09 -0400 (EDT) From: "Keith F. Lynch" <kfl at KeithLynch.net> To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at WSFA.org> Subject: [WSFA] Re: Warning Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at WSFA.org> Yes, I too am concerned by the lack of verifiable detail. In fact, you'll note that I promptly asked for some in the rec.arts.sf.composition newsgroup where someone mentioned the URL in question. I am not vouching for it. I have no idea whether it's true or not. WSFA members are all perfectly capable of making their own evaluation. I find it plausible for several reasons: * Something similar -- but much worse -- happened to me, 27 years ago. * Similar things have happened to several people I know. Many are deeply ashamed of having been arrested, and have only confided in me because I am "out of the closet" as having been falsely convicted of a felony. So it's not surprising that someone with such a story would hide their name and location. * There have been many recent news stories, in mainstream media, with verifiable names and locations, of security run amok. See http://www.stupidsecurity.com/ for pointers to many such stories. * Under the Patriot Act, records of what you checked out of the library and of what you purchased via credit card are available to the government without a search warrant, a subpoena, or any notification to you whatsoever. I don't see this as a left-right thing at all. The erosion of our civil liberties steadily gets worse no matter which party is in power. It's true that the site in question suggests that we should vote. But my take-home message is a little different: * Always keep offsite backups. Even if there is no risk of a police raid, everything in your home could be lost due to fire, flood, tornado, or theft. * Just in case, you may want to buy any controversial books by paying cash, and not using a discount card. Then there's no record as to who bought it. * Just in case, you may want to read any controversial library book in the library, rather than checking it out. It's a matter of simple prudence. Just as everyone should have a fire extinguisher and smoke detector, even if the risk of a fire is very small. I have taken such precautions for decades, whether a Democrat or Republican is in the White House. I am sorry that you, Lee, took it so badly. I was thinking mostly of you when I posted it, since I know you like to write fiction, often on controversial topics. And since, as far as I know, you are not yet professionally published, which will deny you an important defense if you are ever accused. Tom Clancy, Stephen King, or Ann Rule can point to a shelf full of books they wrote on the topic of terrorism and crime that they wrote if they are ever accused. A writer just starting out cannot.