Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:05:38 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
From: ccah at earthlink.net
To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at WSFA.org>
Subject: [WSFA] Re: PhilCon?
Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at WSFA.org>

I guess you could do LOTS of panels on movie interpretations that failed.  In fact, a whole con of it.  But lets not take Capclave there.  We need room for the LOTR panels. :-)

My personal preference is for smaller cons, but I can see the big ones have their advantages.  The Dealers room, if nothing else, is so amazing at a big con. And you can party all you want.  To each their own!
Colleen

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Walsh <MJW at press.jhu.edu>
Sent: Nov 16, 2004 9:24 AM
To: WSFAlist at WSFA.org
Subject: [WSFA] Re: PhilCon?

> elilley at mindspring.com 11/16/04 9:19:00 AM >>>
>Big cons are fun, but so are smaller more focused ones. I'd
>like to see
>Capclave find a niche and work it. I think being a litcon
>doesn't mean
>not having a media tie-in to pull folks in.

"Why the Lensman anime sucked."  Hmmm . . . .

mjw