Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 06:37:20 -0500 To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at WSFA.org> From: Elspeth Kovar <ekovar at worldnet.att.net> Subject: [WSFA] Re: Could be worse timing.... Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at WSFA.org> At 08:43 PM 2/9/05, Ernest Lilley wrote: >I don't get why the timing is so bad here. Let's see...we could have >contacted her the day she died...or months after. This seems like a great >opportunity to reaffirm her place in the club's life, and to let her family >know that she meant something to the group. > >Everybody dies you know...it's only tragic when they didn't live beforehand. I agree with Ernest. Keith, on his own and without word to anyone, did his best to track this person down. Because of that as she died there was affirmation to her family that she continues to live even outside of the things that they knew about her, or knew and didn't remember. Yes, in the best of worlds she'd have found out in person that her connection with WSFA was still remembered. But her family does know. I had occasion to be thinking about such things earlier tonight and wrote: "We've lost various fans, some remembered easily and some not, over the years and sometimes tracked the process of doing so here. I'm not advocating concern for Jack and his family and friends as more or less than anyone else who's been ill, the connection to fandom being personal or public. Instead this is mention of my own good thoughts to all of them and theirs, whether in hopes of recovery or in trying to accept saying goodbye. Or in continued regret that we've had to say so. Which is more than enough mawkish drivel. Suffice to say that what comes to mind is that there was a lot of humour on Joe's last night, and that somewhere Johannes is *still* laughing about my reaction to both my first international fan party and then the discovery that even overseas folks knew about the last Disclave. Pity that we can't invite him -- and many others -- as guests of honor for Capclave or other cons so they can share such stories. But as I said, I'm sure they're laughing. (Okay, given the mawkish drivel, in this case probably laughing *at* us, or rather me, rather than with us, but what the heck. I'm in favor of laughter.)" Of course, I also talk to my cats . . . But I still figure that anyone who has lived, rather than simply existed, is as truly vital as our memories of them are. Keith, I talked to Joe as his body finally gave up, long after his mind had died, and it wasn't just for the sake of the two of us there who weren't dying. (And, come to think of it, well after people thought his mind had died but his body was still alive he and I talked, but that was totally unexpected.) He's still around, just not present. Johannes is *still* laughing about that encounter, and delighted to rub my nose into it as I go from brand-new to conrunning to whatever, all the while pretending to not understand the point of his English. I still and will probably always hear someone I only had the fortune to meet during two Worldcons when I'm making tea in the morning, archly iterating the ways that I'm doing it wrong with that undercurrent of laughter. She's laughing as much as she always was -- though perhaps also more concerned since she can't bail folks out when they're being foolish. But she's equally very much alive. The problem is not letting people know how much they're appreciated when they're present to enjoy it; that I learned watching Joe's amazement at all the folks who came to see him. I'm glad that he was present for it as he was like a cynic who suddenly found that Santa Clause really did exist after all. And that he was on the 'nice' list. Of course, there's also ". . . and oh/the difference to me" That difference is never to be discounted and can hurt like hell. Hearing someone laugh as you're groggily stumbling about trying to make tea is lovely, and all the more so when they're not physically there laughing at you. But it's not the same if you can't then go dash off an email or look forward to seeing them so you can laugh back. Elspeth