From: Michael Pederson <mike at nthzine.com>
Subject: [WSFA] Re: Improved Logo
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 18:25:40 -0500
To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at WSFA.org>
Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at WSFA.org>

Looks like the same old logo to me.

Michael D. Pederson
Publisher/Editor
Nth Degree

On Mar 5, 2005, at 5:49 PM, Keith F. Lynch wrote:

> There have been lots of proposed new WSFA logos discussed here
> recently.  I can't fully participate in that discussion, since mine
> is a text-only Internet account.  I'd been waiting until a consensus
> emerged.  But at last night's meeting Sam Lubell urged me to go ahead
> and replace the current logo with Gayle's variation, which she had
> emailed me on the 28th.
>
> (Yes, I can receive attachments via email, so long as they are less
> than about 60k in size.  And I can install them on web pages.  I'm
> just a little reluctant to do so since I can't see what I'm doing, and
> since spammers and viruses have been known to forge the addresses of
> WSFA members (including me).  I would hate to inadvertently install
> pornography or viruses on our website.)
>
> I've installed Gayle's logo on the main page of the mirror site,
> http://keithlynch.net/wsfa/.  I will copy it to our main site,
> http://www.wsfa.org/, in a couple days if the consensus is positive.
> If I don't hear anything either way, I will make no further changes
> until after the next meeting.
>
> I think Gayle's change is a minor one, perhaps only in the colors.  I
> don't intent that this preclude more radical changes.  In fact, I'd
> like to completely start over, since my understanding is that the
> author of the original logo isn't happy with our continued use of it.
> And since several WSFAns are dissatisfied with it for various esthetic
> or stylistic reasons.
>
> A couple weeks ago I changed the background color on our pages on our
> main site.  Hearing no objection, I've made the same changes on our
> pages on the mirror site.  As always, please promptly tell me if
> anything looks wrong.  Thanks.
>
> Please reply only to me, not the whole list, unless you think your
> comments would be of interest to all WSFAns.  Thanks.
>