Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 21:32:30 -0500 (EST) From: "Keith F. Lynch" <kfl at KeithLynch.net> To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at WSFA.org> Subject: [WSFA] Top Posting, overquoting, grammatical errors, etc. Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at WSFA.org> The big issue isn't top posting vs. bottom posting vs. side posting. It's overquoting and garbled quoting. One reason I'm reluctant to provide a digest option for this list, i.e. an option to have all of the day's messages bundled together into one big message, is because I just know that someone would include the whole daily digest in their reply. I've seen it too many times on other lists. One former subscriber to this list was notorious for not distinguishing in any way between her text and the text she was replying to, leading to confusion all around. For a truly awful recent example of garbled quoting in rasff/rasfw, see http://groups-beta.google.com/group/rec.arts.sf.written/msg/be55a73254239daa As for grammar and spelling, I think mine continues to improve. Partly because whenever I'm in doubt, I can do a Google search of the word or phrase. Believe it or not, correct usages on the net always outnumber incorrect usages. Or at least I've never been able to find any instance of a misspelled word that got more "hits" than the same word correctly spelled. (And if it did, then by what standard is it wrong, since dictionaries are supposed to be descriptive, not prescriptive?) Wade and I have now produced ten WSFA Journals totaling 210 pages, and as far as I know there's not a single misspelling or grammatical error in any of them. (Corrections eagerly solicited.) Of course there's also the issue of the *wrong* word. A common one on the net is "loose" where "lose" is meant. And of course the old classics: principle/principal, capital/capitol, discrete/discreet, compliment/complement, affect/effect, etc. And the people who think that the purpose of an apostrophe is to warn that an "s" is coming. (I've also been seeing plenty of text which is simply missing all apostrophes, or in which they've been replaced with random garbage. I blame Microsoft.) Fortunately I have a knack for nitpicking. I know, for instance, that it's "Hudson Bay," but "Hudson's Bay Company". "Hard disk" but "compact disc". Is anyone hiring uncredentialed proofreaders? Copy editors? Fact checkers? I've got to start earning some money somehow. And it looks like the IT market for people without security clearances has completely collapsed. Thanks.