From: MarkLFischer at aol.com Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 15:48:51 EST Subject: [WSFA] Re: Who said: SF is fantasy with nuts and bolts painted on? To: WSFAlist at WSFA.org Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at WSFA.org> In a message dated 4/1/2005 2:44:54 PM Eastern Standard Time, omni at omniphile.com writes: >Small quibble...teleportation does exist. It's been done in the lab. Only >useful so far if you want to ship quantum particles though. That's a reach. One cannot step into a booth and be whisked off to another place, and it's highly unlikely that we will be able to do so anytime soon. Teleportation is a McGuffin, just like the Fairy Godmother's magic wand. Arguing that something "might happen someday" or "may be happening somewhere else" does not alter the fact that for the story's audience, US, HERE, and NOW, with the knowledge we have available to us, these things do not and cannot exist, and are therefore fantasy elements. >Magic, as it's portrayed in Fantasy, won't (violations of a number of >physical laws). Physical laws as we understand them today. Magic is not effect without cause, it's effect without observable or clearly-understood cause. Clarke's Law applies. The same applies to Science-fictional things such as warp drives or time travel as generally portrayed in stories. Physical law, as we understand it, does not allow such things, and yet we accept them as more "possible" than the Sorcerer's Apprentice and his mops. Most SF or Fantasy stories have postulates you have to accept, disbelief to willingly suspend. Agreeing to accept, for the duration of the story, that there are aliens from other worlds is the same as accepting that the correct incantation can make a carpet fly. Neither kind of story is set in "our universe", but in a different one...similar, but with some different postulates. >SF has been dealing with things like cloning for decades...and now it's here >and we have to figure out how to handle it. Thanks to SF there has been >some thought put into the question ahead of time, with speculation about >potential outcomes and uses. I'm not as impressed with SF's power to prognosticate as you are. Technological innovation rarely takes the exact form that storytellers predicted, and the societal background against which it's set almost never does. SF fans may have thought things out, but that only benefits the SF fans. Actual decision-making happens for political reasons, and is extremely sensitive to a range of factors far too broad for most SF stories. Many technological titans have been inspired by SF, it is true. Fantasy also inspires, although not usually to build rockets. >Her aliens are some of the most alien aliens I've >read about so far. Some, like the Kif, are nothing at all like people. >(snip)when she goes for alien, she goes the whole distance and does it very well. That's why I chose her. The Kif are very alien, BUT...accept and understand the postulates, and they're human as hell. As we come to understand how Kif differ from us, the underlying common factors become very clear. Sikkukkut (who I would certainly consider a main character) is quite well-drawn, and easy to identify with, once you get a handle on what makes Kif peculiar. Hani are the same way, regarding their social structure. I notice that Cherryh never tried to tell a story from a Knnn point of view. That might prove impossible to read, and almost as hard to write. >Fantasy postulates are, in good writing, internally consistent, but applicable only >to that world, not the real world. True, but "Rendezvous with Rama" and "Ringworld" are not set in this world, either. All the stories we tell happen in worlds that exist between our ears. They may be more or less similar to ours, but they are equally unreal. >That tends, for me, to make >SF more "important", or maybe "relevant". Doesn't mean I don't enjoy >reading fantasy at times, I do. How people meet and overcome challenges is always relevant, and happens in all literature. I like SF and Fantasy for the imaginative storytelling, and for the company of the fine folks who enjoy it with me :-) Mark