Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 10:33:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: Drew Bittner <drewbitt at yahoo.com>
Subject: [WSFA] Re: Enterprise - the end is nigh!
To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at WSFA.org>
Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at WSFA.org>

Creatively, it's long been fallow ground.
I'm with Cathy-- let it rest for the better part of a
generation (no pun intended). Maybe then someone with
something to say (not laboring under the Ghost of
Roddenberry, hopefully) will take it over and make
something interesting out of it again.
For now, let it die. Death-with-dignity might have
happened six years ago, but better late than never.

Drew

--- Ern <elilley at mindspring.com> wrote:
> In fact the whole franchise has outlived its reality
> by several generations.
>
> It's time (or past) to let it go.
>
> Trek is a period piece, and that period is long
> gone. To keep propping it up is ghastly.
>
> It's dead Jim...but not as we know it.
>
> Ern
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cathy Green <dalek_cag at yahoo.com>
> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 09:57:45
> To:WSFA members <WSFAlist at WSFA.org>
> Subject: [WSFA] Re: Enterprise - the end is nigh!
>
> I don't think Enterprise's demise is due to the
> advent
> of reality tv, I think it's due to the fact that
> it's
> not very good.  I don't want this show saved.  I
> want
> the franchise to rest a few years and come back with
> a
> brand new set of showrunners and writers with a
> fresh
> perspective who aren't as obsessed with T&A as Braga
> and Berman, and set in the far future rather than
> between now and the original series.
>
> Enterprise deserves to be taken out and shot to put
> it
> out of my misery.
>
> --cathy
>
> __________________________________________________
>
> Sent via BlackBerry from Cingular Wireless
>

__________________________________