Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 10:58:32 -0500
From: thaughey <thaughey at acnet.net>
To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at WSFA.org>
Subject: [WSFA] Re: Enterprise - the end is nigh!
Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at WSFA.org>

Enterprise needs to receive a well-publicized Hugo once it expires.
Maybe that would shake something loose with respect to the SciFi channel
being allowed to take it on.  That is, if it would be possible to get
the cast and crew together again.  They are currently scattering to the
winds seeking other employment, although the top stars seem content to
take a few months off.  --Tom Haughey

Mike B. wrote:

>At 12:35 PM 4/17/05 -0700, N Lynch wrote:
>
>>--- "Mike B." <omni at omniphile.com> wrote:
>>
>>>I think the Tivo caught it (haven't watched it to
>>>check yet)...they're all reruns these days though.
>>>
>>Oh, no, no, no.  *Enterprise* is nearing the end so
>>they have started showing the last, I believe, six,
>>Friday being the first of the last.
>>
>
>Yes.  I was thrown off by the recent "viewer's choice" reruns.  Since
>Stargate Atlantis, Stargate SG-1 and Battlestar Galactica have all hit end
>of season a couple of weeks ago, just when Enterprise started doing reruns,
>I figured it was over too.  Oops.
>
>>Last Thursday's WASHINGTON POST's TV column was about the local UPN
>>station which has a contract to show Nationals game,
>>two of which will be preempting two of the last
>>original episodes of *Enterprise*.
>>
>
>I missed at least one episode during the season due to that idiocy.  They
>ran the game long, so I missed the last half of the show on Tivo.  Since
>then I've told Tivo to record ALL of them, even duplicates, in case this
>stupidity happens again.
>
>>Those episodes will be ONLY shown on Saturday at 6 PM.  I don't know
>>if CH 20 will be repeating any of *Enterprise* once it
>>ends.
>>
>
>I kinda hope the whole thing moves to Scifi like some other series have.
>Enterprise is the last show on UPN that I watch, and if it moves, I'll
>never have to put up with their preempting a show I want for a stupid
>sporting event that can't finish on time...
>
>-- Mike B.
>