Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 00:33:24 -0400
To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at WSFA.org>
From: "Mike B." <omni at omniphile.com>
Subject: [WSFA] Re: Quoting
Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at WSFA.org>

At 09:51 PM 4/21/05 -0400, Candy Madigan wrote:
>Exactly.  It allows you to read the post and if you need a referent, it is
>right there.  And if you don't, then you don't need to read the old
>stuff.  It is simplicity itself to tell where the new stuff ends and old
>stuff begins, so unless someone is interspersing, all you have to do is
>read the post and ignore the rest.
>
>At 12:39 PM 4/21/2005, you wrote:
>>I would hope so.  Luckily, my email software allows me to
>>set top posting as a preference.  For the life of me I can't
>>
>>Ted White wrote:
>>
>> >----- Original Message -----
>> >From: "Michael Walsh" <MJW at press.jhu.edu>
>> >To: <WSFAlist at WSFA.org>
>> >Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2005 10:37 AM
>> >Subject: [WSFA] Re: Quoting
>> >
>> >>Especially if one's software allows only top posting...
>> >
>> >Does any such exist?
>> >
>> >--Ted White
>
>Candy

Ok, I can't resist.  Steve?  Other experienced netters?  Let's show them
why everyone using the same standard is a Good Idea (tm).  Next reply goes
at the top...

-- Mike B.
--
FLW: You obviously don't know who you're dealing with.