Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 01:49:43 -0400 (EDT) From: "Keith F. Lynch" <kfl at KeithLynch.net> To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at WSFA.org> Subject: [WSFA] Re: Quoting Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at WSFA.org> As I mentioned, my strong preference is for including only enough quoted text to establish context. Frequently, as in this case, that amount is "none at all". A good rule of thumb is to pretend you have to *retype* what you are quoting. If it's not something you would retype, don't include it. Imagine your message printed in a fanzine. How do you want it to look? Should it really contain lines containing half a dozen angle brackets? Should the quoted text alternate between long lines and lines with just one word on them? Have mercy on your readers. Also keep in mind that the messages are all permanently archived on the WSFA website. That website is limited to 150 megabytes, unless the club wants to start spending real money for it. That 150 megabytes is for all the Capclave information, all the WSFA Journals, our calendar of upcoming events, pictures, WSFA and Disclave history, and much else. When someone quotes 157 lines, four levels deep, to add *one word* -- which happened this morning -- that's space permanently set aside that can't be used for something more interesting. Top posting vs. bottom posting is mostly beside the point. Yes, a mixture of the two is an unreadable mess, but there should never be a mixture unless the sender is quoting two or more levels deep, which should be extremely rare. And if there is a legitimate need to quote two levels deep, simply edit the levels into your preferred quoting style. If you're too busy to make your message look readable, please wait until you're no longer too busy before posting. Thank you. As for history, Steve got it mostly right. The ARPAnet and early Internet standard was actually to quote by indenting, not with angle brackets. This standard presumably came from books and magazines, in which brief excerpts of text being commented on are indented. The angle bracket standard started on Usenet (which was originally completely separate from the Internet) in 1982, and spread to the Internet by late 1983, though it didn't really catch on until 1985 or so.