Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 09:47:36 -0400
To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at WSFA.org>
From: Candy Madigan <candymadigan at mindspring.com>
Subject: [WSFA] Re: Quoting
Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at WSFA.org>

At 12:33 AM 4/22/2005, you wrote:
>At 09:51 PM 4/21/05 -0400, Candy Madigan wrote:
> >Exactly.  It allows you to read the post and if you need a referent, it is
> >right there.  And if you don't, then you don't need to read the old
> >stuff.  It is simplicity itself to tell where the new stuff ends and old
> >stuff begins, so unless someone is interspersing, all you have to do is
> >read the post and ignore the rest.
> >
> >At 12:39 PM 4/21/2005, you wrote:
> >>I would hope so.  Luckily, my email software allows me to
> >>set top posting as a preference.  For the life of me I can't
> >>
> >>Ted White wrote:
> >>
> >> >----- Original Message -----
> >> >From: "Michael Walsh" <MJW at press.jhu.edu>
> >> >To: <WSFAlist at WSFA.org>
> >> >Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2005 10:37 AM
> >> >Subject: [WSFA] Re: Quoting
> >> >
> >> >>Especially if one's software allows only top posting...
> >> >
> >> >Does any such exist?
> >> >
> >> >--Ted White
> >
> >Candy
>
>Ok, I can't resist.  Steve?  Other experienced netters?  Let's show them
>why everyone using the same standard is a Good Idea (tm).  Next reply goes
>at the top...

Well, I think I already addressed this one.