Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 09:21:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: Drew Bittner <drewbitt at yahoo.com>
Subject: [WSFA] Re: Newton or einstein?
To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at WSFA.org>
Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at WSFA.org>

--- Ted White <twhite8 at cox.net> wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Drew Bittner" <drewbitt at yahoo.com>
> To: "WSFA members" <WSFAlist at WSFA.org>
> Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 10:20 AM
> Subject: [WSFA] Re: Newton or einstein?
>
> > --- Ernest Lilley <elilley at mindspring.com> wrote:
> > > Ted Said: "Cause-and-effect, rationally applied,
> led
> > > to every major
> > > superstition/religion, you know.  I burn a
> virgin at
> > > the stake and it
> > > rains, a deluge that breaks the drought.  Cause
> and
> > > effect!"
> > >
> > > Ah so you're of the let's throw the baby out
> with
> > > the bathwater school? The
> > > virgin thing should fall apart with the
> application
> > > of a little scientific
> > > method, assuming one could find a valid
> population
> > > for testing.
> > >
> > > Ernest Lilley
> >
> > Suppose we start with test groups of virgins,
> recently
> > deflowered virgins and "women of easy virtue"...
> :)
>
> You guys!  So sexist!  There *are* male virgins too,
> you know....
>
> --Ted White

As in "Monty Python and the Holy Grail"-- it's just a
model... :)

__________________________________