Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 09:55:24 -0400 To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at WSFA.org> From: Candy Madigan <candymadigan at mindspring.com> Subject: [WSFA] Re: Friday will probably be my last WSFA meeting Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at WSFA.org> I'm going to point something out here. Keith said he wouldn't come back to the Gilliland's *before* Lee kicked him out. Sorta like "I quit!", "No you don't! You're fired." Being banned from the Gillilands really *was* his own fault. Had he not "quit" I doubt he would have been "fired". At 02:23 AM 10/18/2005, you wrote: >Most Remarkably, Keith F. Lynch wrote: > >Sam Lubell wrote: > > > > > I spoke to the Gillilands yesterday. They are not excluding any > > > paid-up WSFA member from the meeting part of WSFA meetings. > > > >Who is going to come to a house where they clearly aren't welcome, and > >aren't allowed to stay for the social hour? For that matter, with > >traffic and Metro as unpredictable as they are, the only way people > >can be reasonably sure they'll be on time for meetings is to aim to > >arrive early. Are people expected to sit in their parked cars until > >9:15? Are those of us who arrive by train, bus, or bike expected to > >stand out in the rain or snow until that hour? The idea is absurd and > >offensive. No WSFA vote held in a house where some people are made > >to feel unwelcome because of their stand on a WSFA issue should be > >considered valid. > > > > > We don't all have to be best friends, but I think we can all get > > > along with each other and work together as long as we remember that > > > our fellow members are human too and have feelings that can get hurt > > > and brains that can misfire, make mistakes, and sometimes fail to > > > understand what we intended to mean. > > > >Because this attitude towards Lee's actions seems to be widespread > >within WSFA, this Friday will probably be my last WSFA meeting. I am > >not ruling out the possibility that I will remain in WSFA, but this is > >seeming increasingly unlikely. > >Like most WSFAns, I have wished desperately that the current fracas between >Keith and Lee would blow over, and life could continue in a fannish comfort >zone. It's just not happening, and it's not going to. Nobody involved can >back down. At this point I must state my agreement with the points raised >by Walter Miles and Ted White, and insist that it is intolerable that Keith >should be excluded from any WSFA activity because of this unhappy >misunderstanding. While I have, over many years, invariably supported the >rights of WSFA hosts over contentious members and the parents of unruly >children, this is a case where the host is plainly in the wrong. And must >not be permitted to drive a conscientious and hard-working member from our >fold. > >Barry Candy (301)345-6635