Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 18:39:23 -0400 To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at WSFA.org> From: Candy Madigan <candymadigan at mindspring.com> Subject: [WSFA] Re: Great Con Redux...(DMZ Version) Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at WSFA.org> I wonder if I could get Kindra to be the writer? This is not a request for permission, but a speculation about whether she would be willing. At 02:36 PM 10/18/2005, you wrote: >On Mon, 17 Oct 2005, Mike B. wrote: > > > At 03:03 PM 10/17/2005 -0400, Lawhorn, William - BLS wrote: > >> Speaking of interesting con things. I thought I heard talk of a reviewers > >> workshop for next year. That could be a great addition to the > programming. > >> We all love to read Science Fiction, some even write it, but it would be > >> even better if we could all write about it. That would improve the > work of > >> current and future reviewers and hopefully create a pool of people and > >> material to use in the WSFA journal. > > > > I'd love to see someone *write* something too. Either a single author > > going through whatever it takes to create a short story, perhaps with > > audience interaction, or a panel of them creating a group work. From idea, > > through planning, to actual first draft...or even second (being able to > > edit your own stuff is critical). Seeing the sorts of decisions that are > > made, and why, would be really helpful to lots of wannabes, and perhaps > > even some active writers. > >Here's a slightly different approach that might be of interest: > >Have an author -- or maybe an aspiring author -- write a short story >before the con. Give copies to the panel of reviewers to analyze, maybe >on the classic (?) Elizabeth Moon (?) model: a one-sentence summary of >what they thought the story was about; how it succeeded; how it failed; >how it could be improved. Then, at CapClave, make copies of the story >available to the attendees at the session so they can follow the critiques >as the reviewers speak. This might require signup for the session so's to >know how many copies of the story to provide...oops, change that: a >pre-announced limit on attendees so the copies can be prepared in advance. > >Does this sound (1) doable and (2) interesting? > >-- Dick Eney Candy (301)345-6635