From: "Robert MacIntosh" <macbuccfo at msn.com>
To: WSFAlist at WSFA.org
Subject: [WSFA] Re: Which is bigger, $49,999.95 or $50K?
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 14:46:11 -0500
Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at WSFA.org>

But ultimately the wisest on your part. Let's face it, if you got 50K to
blow on the toy, you ain't worried about where your next meal is coming
from. Hell, you probably wouldn't buy from the company anyway, since you
only drop your money at Neimus Marcus.

Bob MacIntosh

>From: "Mike B." <omni at omniphile.com>
>Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at WSFA.org>
>To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at WSFA.org>, WSFAlist at WSFA.org
>Subject: [WSFA] Re: Which is bigger, $49,999.95 or $50K?
>Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 04:36:40 -0500
>
>At 01:18 AM 11/2/2005 EST, MarkLFischer at aol.com wrote:
> >In a message dated 11/1/2005 11:22:17 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> >elilley at mindspring.com writes:
> >
> >>are the rest of you too smart to feel it, even
> >>if you're sure  you wouldn't fall for it?
> >
> >No, it gets me too, and I have to consciously add the extra penny or
>nickel.
>
>It gets me, but not in the way they intend.  When I see it I think, "Ok,
>you mean $50,000 and you think I'm an idiot."  It's not the best sales
>pitch one might come up with...
>
>-- Mike B.
>--
>There's more to this redistribution of wealth business than meets the eye!
>