Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 20:13:34 -0500
To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net>
From: Elspeth Kovar <ekovar at worldnet.att.net>
Subject: [WSFA] Re: Concerning the draft of WSFA minutes; WSFA lists
Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at KeithLynch.net>

At 09:49 AM 11/18/2005, N Lynch wrote:
>--- Elspeth Kovar <ekovar at worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>[snipped for length]
> > This was news to me and, it seems, to everyone who
> > wasn't at that
> > meeting.  (That Keith is *not* the proprietor of the
> > WSFA list should go
>
>Let's try to nip this in the bud, as unfannish as that
>may be, before anymore misunderstandings occur.  The
>question - and it was just that - a QUESTION - was: is
>a non-WSFA member was allowed to have a WSFA email
>address?

<snip>

 From the draft of the minutes posted to "wsfa-forum":

"Rich Lynch's motion was seconded, and put to a vote. There were nine in
favor, no opposed, and nine abstentions."

This very much sounds as if there was a motion, it was seconded, and it was
voted upon.  My question is what the motion was that nine people voted for.

Elspeth.