Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 11:48:22 -0500
From: Ted White <twhite8 at cox.net>
To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at KeithLynch.net>
Subject: [WSFA] Re: Alexis Goes Public
Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at KeithLynch.net>

Mike B. wrote:

>  Since this is strictly a factual reply, I'll respond to a Ted post
>  on-list...
>
>  At 1/5/2006 11:46 PM, Ted White wrote:
>
> > I've already sent Mike Glyer a four-page letter in which I quoted
> > somewhat from an interesting item which arrived in my mail the
> > other day. Postmarked Maryland and anonymously mailed, it's a
> > six-page printout of a series of quotes from the WSFA list,
> > interleaved with connective narrative in boldface. It's basically
> > the narrative of both the 2002 fracus and the current one, and I
> > found it a handy reference. I wonder how many of you also got a
> > copy; I know I'm not the only one.
>
>  I got one too. No return address, my address was printed by machine
>  and taped to the front, and the postmark was "suburban MD".
>
>  Since I wasn't on the list when the first fracas occurred, it was
>  interesting to see what happened back then. Alexis had made
>  references to it when I started attending meetings again, at the
>  Ginter's and noted that Lee and Keith seemed to have personal issues
>  between them, but his version was very different from what the mail
>  messages quoted in that package show. He told me that Keith had been
>  stalking Lee for instance.

Lee originated that delusion, but it appears Alexis bought into it.
It's remarkable how badly they regard Keith, and how readily they are
willing to believe the worst of him or other people -- and how resistant
they are to correction, even to common sense.

What astonishes me is that *Keith* was unaware of this "stalking" charge
until I told him, relatively recently.  They had spread this story
widely but never confronted Keith with it and apparently no one else had
passed the info on to Keith.

--Ted White