Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 15:07:56 -0400
To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at KeithLynch.net>, WSFAlist at KeithLynch.net
From: "Mike B." <omni at omniphile.com>
Subject: [WSFA] Re: Election results....?
Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at KeithLynch.net>

Given that the election took place in VA, those who can't, or won't, go to
that location didn't get a vote.  I'm sure it was all done legally and in
accordance with the bylaws...more or less...but perhaps we should think
about alternating election locations and give everyone a chance?  Just a
thought.

-- Mike B.

At 5/25/2006 02:33 PM, Robert MacIntosh wrote:
>Besides, it the same idiots except for Sect. Someone named Drew decided to
>loss whatever remained of his mind. Trustees -Lee on the right, Lee on the
>left and Steve Smith in the middle.
>
>Bob MacIntosh
>
> >From: "Keith F. Lynch" <kfl at KeithLynch.net>
> >Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at KeithLynch.net>
> >To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at KeithLynch.net>
> >Subject: [WSFA] Re: Election results....?
> >Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 22:39:55 -0400 (EDT)
> >
> >"Michael Walsh" <MJW at press.jhu.edu> wrote:
> >
> > > So.... since the website isn't current... who are the new officers?
> >
> >Don't be too hard on the webmasters.  Unless the rules have changed
> >in the past few months, the new officers don't take office until the
> >first meeting in June, so http://www.wsfa.org/officers.htm is still
> >correct.
> >
> >You can complain if officers.htm, officersbydate.htm, and
> >officersbyname.htm haven't been updated by the end of the
> >June 4th weekend.
> >