Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 11:50:06 -0400 (EDT)
From: dicconf <dicconf at radix.net>
To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at KeithLynch.net>
Subject: [WSFA] Re: Gilliland Fliers
Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at KeithLynch.net>

On Mon, 23 Oct 2006, Elspeth Kovar wrote:

> It's possible that the person Ted is quoting isn't credible, I wouldn't
> know since he posted (quite rightly) without attribution.

When the alleged reporter speaks of the flier being of interest to lawyers
-- I think we will not be wrong if we read this as suggesting that it's
libellous enough to be legally actionable -- and the report itself is
disputed by more than one Capclave attendee, I wouldn't say leaving him
anonymous is the right thing to do.

-- Dick Eney